Skip to Main Content Skip to Main Navigation
Mother holding a baby in her arms
Childhood Exposure to Domestic Violence Should Prompt Support, Not Removal

Nicholson vs. Scoppetta established a pivotal legal framework for assessing allegations of child abuse and neglect stemming from exposure to domestic violence, with a particular emphasis on preventing children from being separated from a parent who has endured or survived domestic violence.

20 Years after the landmark Nicholson case, children continue to be removed based on a victim parent’s inability to prevent a child from witnessing their own abuse, even when the trial court’s decision and subsequent evidence have found that the very act of separating a child from their parent produces more harm.

For Child Abuse Prevention month, the National Center to Advance Peace for Children, Youth, Families, in partnership with the ABA Center on Children and the Law, and Futures Without Violence, releases Nicholson’s Four Factors for Judicial Consideration in Cases Involving Domestic Violence and Children.

This brief introduces the Nicholson Four-Point rubric for child welfare cases involving domestic violence, providing a thorough review by survivors with firsthand child welfare system experience, and presents a model legal analysis for using the rubric. It summarizes the original case decision and refines the four-factor analysis through the lens of survivor parents to improve understanding and application in systems practice and court decision-making.

Mother in bed with her baby
Center to Advance Peace American Bar Association Future Without Violence

Para solicitar esta información en español, por favor envíenos un correo electrónico a This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

© 2024 American Bar Association, Futures Without Violence, and National Center to Advance Peace for Children, Youth, and Families. All rights reserved. The views expressed herein have not been approved by the House of Delegates or the Board of Governors of the American Bar Association and accordingly should not be construed as representing the policy of the American Bar Association. The production of this publication was supported by Grant 90EV0531 from the Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families; Grants 90EV0401, 90EV0524, 90EV0532, and 90EV0545 from the Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Family and Youth Services Bureau, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; and by Grant 90CA1850 from the Children’s Bureau, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Points of view shared in this publication do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Back to top